Fair Work Act 2009 based on the pluralist frame of reference Essay

Fair Work Act 2009 based on the pluralist frame of reference - Essay Example Firms have also faced with a growing need for emphasizing more on the alignment between commercial objectives and employment practices in the organization. The research identifies the logics of managerial authority and also its legitimacy; and the way value systems and personal assumptions held by managers can predispose them to perceive workplace relations and characteristics of work in particular ways. The paper researches on some of the contemporary theories within the domain of such systems. It analyzes the way judgments made about the worth of these theories are shaped by the value systems and the set of assumptions that people hold towards the workplaces. The analysis works as a guide towards evaluating one’s own value systems and assumptions by application of practical theories to the real world concepts. The discussion revolves around the concepts identified by Alan Fox (1966, 1974) as a means of classifying the various assumptions that people hold towards workplaces. The three frames of references which he refers to in his arguments are the unitarist, pluralist and radical (Marxist) assumptions. The project brings forth arguments for the Fair Works Act 2009 being significantly grounded on the pluralist frame of reference. The specific clauses within the act which supports the argument are identified and put forth (Abbott, p.187-189). Frames of Reference Every individual have different manners of opinions regarding the events that they witness in their day to day lives. These opinions are largely shaped by their families, friends and also circumstances such as the jobs they carry out in their respective fields, churches and clubs that they patronize, the communities they belong to etc. Because of the fact that that works is an essential part of people’s lives, its characteristics and nature is regarded as an important social phenomenon which evokes passionate debates. These debates are popularly framed in terms of the values and assumption s that individuals use as reference points while perceiving their governance and nature of works. This has generated the term ‘frame of reference’ by Alan Fox (1966, 1974) as a way of categorizing the various opinions and propositions put forth by people towards these issues (Abbott, p.191). Fox has claimed that these frames of references capture the recent opinions which he defined with regards to the credentials of the unitarist, pluralist and Marxist approaches. The idea is to understand that two different interpret two different situations differently and arise at two different conclusions from the very same phenomenon. The meaning that Fox applied to his frames of references is that differences in values and assumptions about workplace relations, nature of works and conflicts at the workplace generate differing theoretical explanations and conclusions about the matter. The popular theories which have generated out of these are unitarist, pluralist and Marxist conce pts (Abbott, p.191). The unitarist views begin from the values and assumptions which say that conflicts are not considered an inevitable characteristic of relationships between employees and managers. It is possible for conflicts to arise on periodic basis. However, such occurrences are regarded to be aberrations in relationships which are inherently tended to be cooperative. People with this perspective perceive managers and employees as having the same interests in the